Europe Template‑class
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Weather: Non-tropical Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force.

A storm will only generally be added to this template if it exceeds the Perils loss investigation level, though this generally doesn't apply to the Nordic region where population density and therefore losses are much lower. please see https://www.perils.org/losses Lacunae ( talk) 21:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Summary of recent storms and status for this page.

*:Abigale (non-qualifying)
*:Desmond (flood)(non-qualifying)
*:Eva (non-qualifying)
*:Ophelia (assessed by Perils at loss below threshold)
*:Emma (non-qualifying)
*:Leslie (non-qualifying)
*:Adrian (Med storm)
*:Lorenzo (non-qualifying)
*:Gloria (Med storm)
*:Ciara (under investigation)
*:Dennis (under investigation)
Lacunae (
talk) 14:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
reply

Why do you think it is entirely down to you to decide what can be added or not. Surely if a storm is already WP:NOTABLE enough to have a page it is also notable enough to be included in the template so that people can find related pages from each article. There is no understandable reason for this separate threshold other than you being difficult as usual. Buttons0603 ( talk) 23:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC) reply

The whole point in using a third party to assess notability was to avoid such accusation. I am under the impression you created a sort of duplicate template which was more inclusive, for your wishes. Lacunae ( talk) 23:13, 27 February 2020 (UTC) reply

I would also point out that the storms are also eminently find-able through their links to their respective "windstorm season" pages. Lacunae ( talk) 23:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC) reply