London Transport Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Trains: in UK / Article maintenance Template‑class

Trains Portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways. This template is supported by the Article maintenance task force.

I put Whitechapel between Liverpool Street and Stratford stations, as it is on the vast majority of trains, and it was reverted as the section is supposedly referring to the services that terminate there. This is just a handful of trains out of hundreds per day. It was all trains on the Elizabeth line for 6 months, but that ended 7 months ago. We're either preserving this template in aspic or missing the forest of services for the tree of those that still terminate at Liverpool Street.

Going through the history of the template, I find this reversion undoing an attempt to treat the line as the one line it has been since November, using a similar format/nonclementure to the other branching TfL routes ( DLR, Central line, District line, Metropolitan line, Northern line, Piccadilly line).

I feel we should bring this template

1. up to date, rather than stuck in the past
2. in line with other TfL Line's Templates

however, attempts to do have been reverted without a discussion beyond a comment in the edit summary.

I'm discussing this, per WP:BRD, because I feel that the reverts of fairly-conservative edits were bold moves, especially given WP:ONLYREVERT, and therefore should be discussed. Let's talk, rather than revert. Encourage the newcomers!

86.18.220.144 ( talk) 14:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC) reply