Pop music Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Should they appear with official band members? best, 194.80.106.135 ( talk) 18:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC) reply

The Complete Depeche Mode link redirects to Depeche Mode discography. Does that mean it contains all of their material until 2006? But this is just guess since it has no article and nothing is mentioned in the discography except it is a digital-only release. 85.217.39.127 ( talk) 17:48, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The Complete Depeche Mode is an iTunes digital boxset released December 19, 2006, fourth in the series of special iTunes releases. [1] The first one was The Complete U2 which has a wiki article. I don't understand why this was redirected in the first place. Can't find the original article anymore. -- Sk4170 ( talk) 23:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I've noticed some people keep putting Dave's solo projects back in this section. Since Dave already has his own template, it's not necessary to include them here. Initially I included Jerry Cantrell's solo albums on the [[[Alice in Chains]] template but someone deleted those because Jerry already has his own template and that is why I keep Dave's solo projects off this one since he has his own template too. Shaneymike ( talk) 17:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC) reply

But not all articles with the DM template will necessarily have Dave's template. best, Sunil060902 ( talk) 18:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC) reply

I agree with Sunil. There are currently 109 pages linking here, but only 13 for Dave's template. If Martin Gore has his solo work included, so should Dave. -- Sk4170 ( talk) 23:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC) reply