This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Passion of the Christ
Seems excessive to include one film, as controversial as it was. I would remove it. Comments?
Alientraveller (
talk) 20:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Talpiot Tomb
I would remove the reference to the Talpiot Tomb, because it is a fringe theory, rejected by the overwhelming majority of scholars. No important scholar of the
historical Jesus mentions it, either Christian (
John P. Meier,
James Dunn), jewish (
Géza Vermes) and atheist (
Maurice Casey,
Bart D. Ehrman). The only important scholar supporting such theory is
James Tabor, who is a known supporter of
fringe theories, rejected by the scholar consensus.--
Karma1998 (
talk) 12:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Similarly, Roza Bal should be removed, because the links to Jesus are completely unfounded, and based on hoax-books. I think that while some the important fringe theories could be kept, the retention of the more obscure fringe theories in a prominent and widely used template is
WP:UNDUE.
The Discoverer (
talk) 04:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I am removing Talpiot Tomb and Roza Bal, because they are examples of lost body/stolen body and swoon hypotheses respectively.
The Discoverer (
talk) 06:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
