Aviation: Airports Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Dallas-Fort Worth NA‑class ( inactive) | |||||||
|
It seems inappropriate that several general aviation airfields are listed as "Municipal" when they are privately owned, e.g. 1F7, F69, & 58F. (In fact, Plano and Carrollton officials have been accused of actively conspiring to close F69 permanently, but I digress.) I propose (and volunteer) to add a "Private & Other" category, along with a "Defunct" category for fields like GSW; however, I'd like to open the topic for discussion first. Carguychris ( talk) 19:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
I was in debate about whether to list Ralph M. Hall/Rockwall under "Hall" or "Rockwall." After some thought, I think it is more logical to list in alphabetical order by municipality, rather than by actual name; this makes it more intuitive to readers who are more likely to know an airport by location rather than by its formal name. Here are the rules I propose to follow:
Thoughts? Carguychris ( talk) 19:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Can anyone confirm through sources meeting WP:RS whether any part of the Grand Prairie AFRC is still being used for the operation of aircraft? I'm wondering if it's still appropriate to describe it as an active airfield, or if it should be moved to the "Defunct and historic" section. The runways have been closed for years, but I'm fairly certain that a seldom-used but technically active helipad remained (remains?) on the site. Carguychris ( talk) 19:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)