Template:CongLinks is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
U.S. Congress Template‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
United States: Government Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 3 January 2014. The result of the discussion was "limit/shorten the number of links". |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Wondering about including Ballotpedia.org for congressional - and other - political offices, campaigns. Doug Grinbergs ( talk) 01:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
It's being displayed unless removing it in article. -- 5.43.86.137 ( talk); 10:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC) [e]
-- 5.43.86.137 ( talk); 11:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC) [e]
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the order of the links to be more alphabetical and less random. This would go:
Effectively, this would just be moving Vote Smart from second place to fourth place, and moving FEC and LOC up a place. Woko Sapien ( talk) 17:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)