Philosophy: Ancient Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
In my opinion, most of this template would be better served by moving most of the content into a seperate page. In it's current form it's very large and unwieldy. Right now, all 7 sections lead to the same 5 pages, except for "Bön" which leads to space instead of Aether (classical element). As well, the layout of each section is interesting, but takes up more space than it really needs to. Any opinions? Prgrmr@wrk 19:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I Think we Need to help put together the Neo-Paganism chart it whould really help explain things.
{{doesnt_work}}
The template doesn´t work. See Classical element article.-- HybridBoy 21:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
The table should be converted to a table using wikisyntax (more info at Help:Table). Gary King ( talk) 21:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
What is this final section labelled Lemurian doing here? it's purely unhistorical and unscientifical. 87.202.170.64 ( talk) 10:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
The Chinese Wuxing does not have a middle affinity, it is a circle circulating. The template is suggesting all cultures have a similar elemental view as the Greeks, and it is misleading and simply wrong in the China and possibly Japanese part where it depicts the middle affinity. I am changing the Chinese one. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearcher talk 02:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Why should only Chinese and Japanese characters be included in an English wikipedia template? My browser just displays them as empty squares. If I could see them, they would be just some special characters. They need to be there in articles, but in the template, they are unnecessary. Why not then Sanskrit, Pali, Tibetan, Greek, Babylonian scripts for other elements? -- Redtigerxyz Talk 16:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC)