Shouldn't this temlate be called Chrysler timeline, or something like that? This timeline doesn't deal with the DaimlerChrysler group, but with a single brand/division/marque/whatever. The problem is that there are already many articles with the current name. Can somebody fix this? Or you think the current name is ok? -- NaBUru38 00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I think the timeline needs more colores, seperating US-Chryslers, EU-Chryslers etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:FB32:4620:408F:18B3:9D8B:5A31 ( talk) 23:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
This is a nice table, but I think fitting more years will make it unreadable. Yes? No? Mr.choppers | ✎ 12:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)