Buses Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Malaysia Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This user by the name of *angys* has repeatedly removed the Pulau Tikus Loop entry in the template, eventhough I have provided a valid reference ( https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2018/05/19/free-cat-mt-erskine-loop-shuttle-to-start-midjune/) by the edit summary that the bus route still exists. This attitude is uncalled for. Vnonymous ( talk) 15:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC) reply

• I only have this as Star or NST not doing about this. Here is the translation and definitely not fake info whether you believe or not.

"949271968490004"%3A%7B"role"%3A1%2C"page_id"%3A949271968490004%2C"post_context"%3A%7B"story_fbid"%3A1732209160196277%2C"publish_time"%3A1530892397%2C"story_name"%3A"EntStatusCreationStory"%2C"object_fbtype"%3A266%7D%2C"actor_id"%3A949271968490004%2C"psn"%3A"EntStatusCreationStory"%2C"sl"%3A4%2C"dm"%3A%7B"isShare"%3A1%2C"originalPostOwnerID"%3A0%7D%2C"targets"%3A%5B%7B"page_id"%3A949271968490004%2C"actor_id"%3A949271968490004%2C"role"%3A1%2C"post_id"%3A1732209160196277%2C"share_id"%3A0%7D%5D%7D%7D&__tn__=C-R

Or this take from his timeline

angys ( Talk Talk) 15:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC) reply

I am flabbergasted! User: *angys* actually had the cheek to post on my talk page that my source is outdated. Okay, so for the record, my source is outdated, and all there is to prove that my source is outdated is a site in Chinese? Are the editors here in English Wikipedia able to comprehend, much less read, Chinese characters? IMHO, not only does the Chinese site goes against WP:NONENG (especially when compared to the English news site I posted above), the user's supporting argument via a Facebook page is not in accordance with WP:SOCIALMEDIA. I am calling for a third opinion for this issue, as I do not see any valid reason whatsoever from this user that the Pulau Tikus Loop should be removed from the template. Vnonymous ( talk) 16:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Response to third opinion request:

I interpret this news story "The Tanjung Tokong/Pulau Tikus loop" as confirmation of the replacement/extension/revamp of the Pulau Tikus loop. So on balance of probabilities I would accept the statement put out on social media by Chris Lee Chun Kit (which itself bends WP:SOCIALMEDIA a little too far). Batternut ( talk) 06:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for pointing this out, @ Batternut:. The article does point out the existence of a Tanjung Tokong/Pulau Tikus loop. However, it does not conclusively confirm in any way that the Pulau Tikus Loop has been terminated. IMO, until its cancellation is reported by a reliable source and as per WP:WAIT, it would be more prudent to retain the Pulau Tikus Loop entry. Vnonymous ( talk) 07:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

To be clear, I would favour removing the separate mention of the "Pulau Tikus loop". Batternut ( talk) 09:57, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply