This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
how long is considered appropriate to keep "proposed" stations listed on the template? they're linked from elsewhere, but not a lot of active work seems to have been done on things like
Calaveras station.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mjdestroyerofworlds (
talk •
contribs)
We really do need to slim down this massive Calaveras and Livermore seem pretty unlikely to go anywhere. Irvington might be worth keeping since it had environmental work last year - but it should be under the expansion subheading to reduce the template height.
Pi.1415926535 (
talk) 02:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)reply