From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Football: American & Canadian Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force.
WikiProject icon Georgia (U.S. state): Atlanta Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the Atlanta task force.
Atlanta task force To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Colors

User:Walter Görlitz, where's the conversation for this infobox? Are you going to talk to me, or just recruit some admins to bully me here, too? Jamesmiko ( talk) 22:42, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

There's no good reason to blank the colors without a real consensus. However, consensuses don't mean anything if they're in violation of WP policies. Jamesmiko ( talk) 22:43, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

WP:CONTRAST is the reason not to apply the colours as you did. I have removed them again. Stop editing against the guideline. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

There cannot be a consensus without a discussion. There's no good reason to blank the template when the colors fall in line with WP:CONTRAST. You cannot revert templates simply you disagree with them. Jamesmiko ( talk) 20:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply