This template is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Untitled
We need to add
Mass spec. Mass spec people claim they will be able to start solving atomic structures similar to
NMR within the next 10 years. --
vossman 17:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)reply
It's totally true. I thought of MS the other day, and then forgot to add it. For now, maybe it's best categorized next to HDX?
Willow 18:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Oops, no room. "Medium resolution" is a better category, anyway.
Willow 18:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)reply
I think this template is annoying and its insertion should be re-engineered. I think there is no relevance at all for this template to be present on all those page. Rather, it should appear only in articles which are also categorized in Biology and Protein Structure. Proteins are only a class of compounds that can be characterized by those techniques. Let's say wikipedian A is interested in Red Bean fatty acids and wikipedian B is interested in Light Emitting Polymers, would should we have "Red Bean" and "LEP" characterization templates in every single page?
132.216.96.223 08:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Equilibrium unfolding, site-directed mutagenesis, and so on. These methods are only useful to study protein structure. They do not allow protein structure determination. This should be move/renamed as "Methods for protein structure analysis" or something like that.
Biophys (
talk) 04:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)reply
In fact, only X-ray and neutron diffraction, NMR and EM (at lower resolution) can be used for protein structure determination.Biophys (
talk) 22:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)reply