From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

High importance and Mid importance are not good classifications and would be high maintenance. Suggest better ones, thanks. Hordaland ( talk) 14:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

I agree that Importance is not a good way to sort them - I think we could use "themes" such as:
Rights and law - (Articles about UN conventions, ADA, etc.)
Social issues - (Articles about Inclusion, Special education, Sport, etc.)
Medical issues - (Articles about Diseases and conditions that lead to disability)
Technology - (Articles about wheelchairs, hearing aids, etc.)
and so on. Roger ( talk) 16:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply