The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Lightbursttalk 01:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Just seen I was supposed to do 2 QPQs for this. I have now done so. --
Grnrchst (
talk) 10:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. Article is well-sourced, presentable, neutral, and BLP-compliant. Earwig looks fine. The hooks are both interesting and cited. Two QPQs have been done. Good work.
gobonobo+c 19:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)