The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 23:46, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk). Self nominated at 17:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC).
Article has been expanded 5x, is long enough, has inline citations throughout to offline sources. Offline source for hook AGF experienced editor (the citation could be moved to the sentence containing the hook, though). I changed the classification from stub, as I understand articles classed as stubs aren't eligible for DYK (it likely merits a higher classification, but I don't have expertise in the subject area, so I'll leave that to someone else). Good to go!
NinaGreen (
talk) 18:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)