The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 15:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi
Michael Barera (
talk), review follows: article moved to mainspace 19 March and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources, citations to the museum's own web site are limited to non-controversial facts; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing and Earwig is happy; I struck ALT2 as I just didn't find it interesting (why 2004?); ALT0 and ALT1 are fine, mentioned in the article and check out to source cited; a QPQ has been carried out; photo is nominator's own work and appropriately licensed. Looks good to go. I had one query, but not going to hold approval over it: Is "shop" widely recognised as a term for "workshop" in NASCAR racing? It confused me at first as I thought it was a literal shop (ie. a store) operated by the team. Worth considering a change to "workshop" in the hook and article to better internationalise it? -
Dumelow (
talk) 07:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks,
Dumelow! I have changed all instances of "shop" to "workshop" in both the article and the hook to improve clarity so that it doesn't sound like "team store".
Michael Barera (
talk) 22:08, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Michael Barera ALT0 one issue, I see this in MotorTrend Over half of those cars have Dale Earnhardt's name lettered over the driver's door. The article does not say that DE actually drove the cars as our hook claims. Some may have been backup cars etc.
Bruxton (
talk) 15:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)