@
GobsPint: - The weight fraud articles has been tagged by @
Lovkal:. This needs to be resolved. --
evrik(
talk) 19:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
I haven't had much luck finding articles explicitly spelling out scale weight fraud outside the US...though it evidently exits.
GobsPint (
talk) 21:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Article all looks good to me: long enough, new enough, citations look good, and no plagiarism found. However, this hook doesn't sound quite grammatically correct to me. How about: ... that putting pre-moistened meat diapers in case-ready meat is a form of weight fraud?Luiysia (
talk) 17:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Case-ready is jargon. Can it be replaced by pre-packaged?
—Femke 🐦 (
talk) 08:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
@
Theleekycauldron: It's ready to go. There's some concern about the {{Globalize}} tag that got added to
weight fraud...I'm having trouble locating sources for a non-US section on weight fraud...though its evidently occuring.
GobsPint (
talk) 04:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to check the above hook (combining
Luiysia's proposed rewrite with
Femke's request as ALT1a) and to take a look at the Globalize tag in
weight fraud to see whether it's an issue that needs to be addressed prior to approval. Thanks.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 03:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
I also just realized that
Luiysia's review refers to "article", singular, but there are two articles in this nomination,
weight fraud and
meat diaper. The new reviewer should check both articles rather than just one, unless Luiysia can confirm which article was reviewed. Thanks again.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Adequate sourcing: - Meat diaper is fine, but the lead section of Weight fraud contains details not cited anywhere in the article, e.g. the sentence about self-checkout machines. Weight fraud also needs a citation for the first paragraph under "Food fraud".
Neutral: - Globalise tag is present in Weight fraud.
Overall: @
GobsPint: Checking
WP:DYKTAG only dispute tags are an issue, and the globalise template does not seem to fall into this category as described by
WP:DT, instead coming under
Wikipedia:Template_index/Cleanup#Neutrality_and_factual_accuracy, so I don't think that should block the nomination, although others may disagree. Earwig is not working for me right now but spot checking sources in articles showed no concerns. Only concern is with the uncited sections of Weight fraud.
CSJJ104 (
talk) 01:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I just rechecked
WP:NPOV and see that the globalise tag is defininitely something which needs to be fixed. I have updated my review above. I did find some possible sources though, not sure if these are of any help in adding examples from outside the US, specifically
Bangladesh and
Norwegian fisheries. I will let you know of any others I may find. Again, sorry for the confusion in my review.
CSJJ104 (
talk) 01:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This is taking too long, and the problematic
weight fraud article hasn't been edited recently to address the issues raised. My suggestion is that this be made a single-article nomination, with weight fraud unbolded, since
meat diaper has been passed by reviewer
CSJJ104:
Pinging nominator
GobsPint so they know where things stand.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
You can remove the
weight fraud from the nomination. I'm unable to address the global tag with
WP:RS, though it would seem self-evident.
GobsPint (
talk) 04:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)