The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Philafrenzy (
talk). Self-nominated at 09:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC).
New, long enough, neutral, well-sourced with no copyvio obvious. Hook is concise, cited, and intriguing for a broad audience. QPQ not done but apart from that looks good to me. New reviewer here so a second opinion would be best. ―
Jjm596✉ 19:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
QPQ done so marking as approved. Gave the article a look per
Jjm596's request. Technically it is 5x expanded rather than new, but both article and review look fine. --
Usernameunique (
talk) 02:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)