The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 21:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. It is neutral in tone, well-cited throughout, and free of any obvious copyvio issues. The hook is formatted correctly, interesting, accurate and cited. QPQ is done. Image looks good, is used in article and has free license. All in all seems good.
Retroplum (
talk) 18:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
@
Retroplum:. Thanks for the review. But please sign your review.--Nvvchar. 06:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Oops. My mistake.
Retroplum (
talk) 18:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)