The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 16:30, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
ACP2011 (
talk). Nominated by
Prioryman (
talk) at 00:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Per the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any
conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review. IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
Review 1
Article is new enough (moved to mainspace 2 days prior), and big enough. Preliminary check is cited enough. Article is not in itself promotional or biased. Hook is in article and cited. No copyright infringement found.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 10:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Review 2 In progress —
Maile66(
talk) 13:36, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
REVIEW #2 COMPLETED - The following has been checked in this review by Maile66
QPQ done by Prioryman on July 12, 2012
Article created by ACP2011 on October 6, 2012 and has 5,366 characters of readable prose
No COI detected
No overt promotional tone detected that would distinguish it from any article written about a listing on the U.S.
NRHP
NPOV, well sourced and well detailed in historical fact
Professional-level article about an ammunitions magazine officially on the
Gibraltar Heritage Trust, a volunteer non-profit group organized to preserve Gibraltar's history
Every paragraph sourced
Hook is interesting, short enough at 170 characters, and sourced at the end of the sentence