The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 16:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by
Michael Barera (
talk). Self-nominated at 16:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC).
Article is new enough and big enough. Each paragraph is cited. Correct person credited. Hook alt2 is misleading in the pictured bit as what is pictured does not look to be the one mounted on the pole. Hook alt2 is in article, cited and confirmed. Hook alt1 is in article split in two places, referenced, and confirmed in the references. Original hook is in article, cited and confirmed. Picture is free, QPQ performed. No copyright infringement detected. Hooks are all hooky. Good to go with original or alt1 hook. (alt 2 would need a different picture)
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 11:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the review,
Graeme. I should have mentioned it in the comment field, but you're right about the change of image necessary for ALT2: it would require
this image of the Petersen's Divan. Thanks for catching my mistake.
Michael Barera (
talk) 19:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)