The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 08:50, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
... that in 1836, a jury ignored the judge's advice and found Daniel Arnoldi guilty of assaulting a black man? Source: "In July, Arnoldi was tried for his assault on Grant; the jury, ignoring the judge's direction, found him guilty."
[1]
ALT2: ... that doctors from
McGill College opposed Daniel Arnoldi's candidacy to chair a medical licencing board, but 14 years later he received an honorary degree from the college? Source: "John Stephenson...and William Robertson...founded...the Faculty of Medicine of McGill College" "Robertson and Stephenson fought the nomination energetically, but in vain." "he had been awarded a doctorate honoris causa by McGill College."
[3]
5x expanded by
Z1720 (
talk). Self-nominated at 23:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC).
Article looks good; clearly long enough. ALT0 is the most interesting to me, although it should probably say what the judge's advice was.
Earwig score looks great. This looks ready to me. —VersaceSpace🌃 14:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi
VersaceSpace, if the article is approved, please add the green tick with this code: {{subst:DYKtick}}. If it is not approved, please let me know what your concerns are and I'll address them. Thanks!
Z1720 (
talk) 15:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Z1720, you could probably tell this is my first QPQ. —VersaceSpace🌃 15:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
@
VersaceSpace: Thanks for reviewing! I hope it was a fun experience and that you will do it again.
Z1720 (
talk) 15:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)