The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 22:24, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Created by
Northamerica1000 (
talk). Self-nominated at 14:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC).
. Article created 15 June 2017. QPQ done. Article is over 1,800 characters. Hooks verified. I prefer the initial hook over ALT1, same as
Northamerica1000 preference.
Sagecandor (
talk) 14:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
@
Sagecandor: please provide a review that explicitly confirms that the
five main DYK criteria have been met. Here you have covered newness, length, cited hook, and QPQ. Missing are close paraphrasing/neutrality checks. Thanks,
Yoninah (
talk) 21:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
The article is neutral. The article is within limits and does not close paraphrase. The other DYK criteria have all been cited as reviewed already, above. The others were also reviewed at time of the first review itself. Now explicitly commented upon also. Done.
Sagecandor (
talk) 22:00, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but do not see anything about carcasses in the 2 sources given. Is it implied by the word "bones"?
Yoninah (
talk) 22:11, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
@
Yoninah: I have added the following source and citation to the article to verify this:
[5] (
diff). North America1000 22:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Restoring tick per Sagecandor's review.
Yoninah (
talk) 22:22, 1 July 2017 (UTC)