The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 12:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
The article is new, long enough at 2,239 chars of prose, neutral and cites sources inline. However,
bare URLs (ref #6 and #8) and ref parameter error (ref #5) need editing. No close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism found according to "Dup detector" bot. The initial hook, which I prefer, is short enough, interesting and neutral. Its fact is cited inline. QPQ was done. Good to go after addressing the raised minor issues.
CeeGee 06:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I have fixed the issues, and also added name of another author. Thank you. --
Human3015TALK 09:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Done expanding, adding refs and fixing things up. I think the article is stable and ready now. Thank you for all your kind attention and efforts. Cheers!Gunkartatalk 06:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)