Wisconsin Highway 29 was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 10, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed January 19, 2008 Good article reassessment Not listed February 11, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / Wisconsin Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics   U.S. state highways   Locations   Wisconsin   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.   Wisconsin Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed "Wis 29 Corridor" link as this no longer exists on destination site (WisDOT) Added a list of communities served, Added info on study projects found on site for freeway conversion (they also appear on Bessert's page) Also added info on the Wausau upgrade project and proper sources. -- Master son 03:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Matched WP:WI settins to WP:WIH for assessment • master_son ^{Talk - Edits} 22:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm done with the first chunck of mileposts in the exit list. Tomorrow, I will work on the others, and hopefully get this exit list ready for GA status. -- JA10 ^{Talk • Contribs} 00:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC) reply

On hold

I'm working on the mileposts for a while but I should be able to finish when I have some free time. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 01:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Failed

I've failed this because the mileposts are at this point incomplete, which is supposed to be complete when this article was nominated for GA status. ( → zel zany - new age roads) 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I failed this, not because of any minor points like mileposts, but because the source for the history is not a reliable source. -- NE2 01:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC) reply

This article was nominated for good article reassessment to determine whether or not it met the good article criteria and so can be listed as a good article. (By master son ^{T - C}, 03:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC).) reply

The article was reinserted into the nominations list. Please see the archived discussion for further information. Geometry guy 13:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I'm doing the review, comments soon. Jimfbleak ( talk) 08:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC) reply

First comments:

1. Intro is much too short, doesn’t even mention history or future plans. I would expect total length (miles and km) in the intro as well as the infobox
2. Please give metric conversions formatted as eg 5 miles (8 km)
3. Style is very staccato in places with one-clause sentences: "WIS 29 goes here. WIS 29 goes there," Can’t some of the sentences be run together to improve flow?
4. Reference needed for While traffic crashes have declined significantly, numerous memorials to those who lost their lives on the road still dot the route.
5. Paras should ideally have at least three sentence. There are a number of one-sentence paras that should be fixed if at all possible.
6. I assume that CTH in the table means County Highway. Can that be made explicit? Also if followed by a single letter, eg CTH T, why not use a no-break space?
7. Bannered highway link - I shouldn’t have to go through another article and a redirect to find what this means
8. Not clear to a non-American that “business route” is an example of a bannered route, please make that clearer in this short section, and perhaps explain what a business route is for us limeys
9. Please check for typos, esp capitals at start of sentence and proper names.

I haven’t checked refs yet, and I’ll have at least one more read through Jimfbleak ( talk) 08:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC) reply

1. "Junction" seems to be used as a verb more than once, eg and junction with Interstate 94. Shouldn't that be "joins" or "has a junction with"?
2. Expressway isn't explained or linked. I assume it means a toll road, but needs to be glossed or linked
3. It seems perverse to link freeway at virtually the last of its many mentions
4. What's "Corridors 2020."??
5. Would it be better to move the first picture to halfway down its section? It will still sandwich text, but in a less narrow place.

Refs are OK, look forward to improvements, Jimfbleak ( talk) 16:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

No changes made in a week, so assessing as is, fail. Jimfbleak ( talk) 06:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello,

Could someone please fix the exit list table? As it stands, from exits 132 to 185, the table looks weird and inconsistently formatted compared to the rest of the table, and the exit number for exit 132 is one column too far forward.

Thank you, Bad Weather 2014 ^{My work • What's wrong?} 21:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC) reply

It appears to be resolved now; thank you, Imzadi1979 for fixing the article. I'm sorry I didn't notice your edits sooner. -- Bad Weather 2014 ^{My work • What's wrong?} 23:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wisconsin Highway 29. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070413092037/http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/maps/docs/counties/brown.pdf to http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/maps/docs/counties/brown.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Wisconsin Highway 29. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516222840/http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/maps/docs/counties/pierce.pdf to http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/maps/docs/counties/pierce.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815173128/http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/maps/docs/counties/shawano.pdf to http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/travel/maps/docs/counties/shawano.pdf
• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://www.5129wausau.com/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20070621094333/http://www.dot.state.wi.us/news/2006/nc-wis29pim2.htm to http://www.dot.state.wi.us/news/2006/nc-wis29pim2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC) reply