This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This entire article is written like an ad. Most of it is unsourced opinion, and what little is sourced is usually sourced using the subject's own web page. Jeppiz ( talk) 09:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20110410004015/http://www.valenzuela.gov.ph/index.php/government/officials, archived 10 April 2011. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 16:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
More than one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the subject, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{ request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 16:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi all!
I've done cleanup on the article for now mostly on WP:MOS and other information. I've removed the other bills filed section since most of the bills I have checked were not made by Mr. Gatchalian only but was also made by other senators with these bills similar to the bills listed in the article [1]
I would also like to note if wingatchalian.com is a reliable source. Most of the initial references cite this website which I believe to be WP:QUESTIONABLE and WP:RSSELF.
Please let me know your thoughts on this! Markoolio97 ( talk) 07:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi All!
I have added small tags and columns-list to help tidy up the article. I did not remove most of the sections as of now per the discretion of User:SSTG but instead I removed some details especially on the First 10 Priority Bills and Awards sections which were overexpanding the sections with mostly trivial information. Given the Manual Of Style in which the article should be written in an encyclopedic manner, information should be kept short and simple. This article need not be a one-stop shop for information but rather an aid for further research by the readers.
Let me know your thoughts on this! Markoolio97 ( talk) 05:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I don't want an edit war over this, and I apologize. But I still think that the previous photo (left) is better than what SSTG prefers (right). I would like to build a consensus regarding the primary image on the infobox.
The photo of the subject on the left is arguably better because it portrays the subject in a more natural setting than on the right which is staged (and seems to be a product of a photo studio). Remember this is a online encylopedia article and not an advocacy page, surrogate political profile page for Gatchalian. The photo on the right would be tolerable if there are no available free image in Wikicommons, but there is. I would like SSTG or any other editor to air their side why they prefer the photo on the left. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 07:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)