This article was nominated for deletion on 21/4/2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Molecular Biology: COMPBIO Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Tree of Life Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Wikipedia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a tag that this stub lacks sources - this might help: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikispecies Not sure if this is sufficient. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.111.8.96 ( talk) 22:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC). reply

Hello, I am indeed holding the copyright for the article that I posted here before - sorry for not knowing how to indicate that. Thanks, Benedikt

Maybe i missed something here, but AFAIK by posting something to wikipedia you are releasing it under the GFDL, and cant just decide to unrelease it. The bellman 05:44, 2004 Oct 27 (UTC)

I moved the article back to the main namespace and changed the redirects. This is in line with the rest of the articles in Category:Wikimedia projects. References to Wikispecies should stay in the main namespace unless they want to cross over to the dark side ;). ∴ here… ♠ 01:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC) reply

For example to answer question what makes Wikispecies different from a biology-limited Wikipedia?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 06:06, 1 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Agreed, more information and clarification is needed, but to answer your example question - Currently, Wikispecies is strictly limited to taxonomic hierarchies and the references which justify them, although interwiki links, images (only one allowed per page), and vernacular names are also included on some pages to better integrate with other Wikimedia projects. Prose and lengthy descriptive content is not included and belongs on the language-specific Wikipedias -- Georgeryp 06:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC) reply

At one time, wasn't the logo for Wikispecies a bee?

That's what I wonder. Think it was around 2004 that it was the project's logo. Not sure about what happened to it. It would help if someone has a copy of that image.

You're right, here we go: [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.232.66.25 ( talk) 16:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC). reply

Templates section has selfrefs - should be easy to fix SP-KP 16:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. (which is impossible, since I already did so) Ucucha 17:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC) reply

There is a note saying that the domain Wikispecies.org was registered by some dude and then transferred over to the foundation, but it does not follow up on what happened to the wikispecies.org domain. Currently, it appears that wikispecies.org is just another parked domain "search" page. Unless the reason why it is not used is given, that domain should not be mentioned in this article. If it is mentioned, it should not be done so prominently. (I believe it is the first url ostensibly pointing to the wikispecies project in the article.)
Granted, I've not done research on who put it in the article, but it just strikes me as not fitting in.
SidShakal ( talk) 00:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply

The domain is now registered by a domain squatter. Since its mention adds nothing to discussion of wikispecies itself, I'm deleting the domain reference from the article. Grothmag ( talk) 23:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Ah, OhanaUnited undid my edit, correctly pointing out that the article indicates the "information" was transferred to the foundation, not the domain itself. My mistake! On the other hand, I'm not sure what the current section means, then. What information? The web content? The whois information? It's a little unclear, I think, and also not useful. Was wikispecies.org ever used, and is it worth recording every domain name change that a project undergoes during the planning stages if those domains are defunct?

I'm inclined to remove the domain name again, unless we can add something about wikispecies' use during the time the domain was active. As it is, coming for information on wikispecies, the first thing I did was click on that link - perhaps that's just me.

(I'd also like to change "co-ordinates" back to "co-ordinated", since everything else is in past tense there... and it's now a Foundation project, no?) Grothmag ( talk) 18:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC) reply

There's no point to remove the dead link if it did happen in the past. Just mention something like "now-defunct website" or similar. And sometimes you should be bold OhanaUnited ^{Talk page} 00:48, 15 June 2008 (UTC) reply

As there's no date or other useful historical information in this section, and no indication of just what Benedikt transferred to the Foundation, I'm going to be bold and chop that bit right out again. The only point I could see is establishing some sort of acknowledgement of priority to Benedikt, but since there are no dates, it reads oddly to say "Benedikt started a now-defunct website, then passed some unknown information to the Foundation". I hope my using an undo is inoffensive, then! Grothmag ( talk) 22:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Not to be overly pedantic, but wouldn't this technically imply that the project was launched on 13 September 2004, and not the 14th? (First edit of Main Page was made at 22:06 UTC on 13 September 2004.) Incidentally, if you look at the revision itself, it might shed some light on the discussion in the previous section. - dcljr ( talk) 10:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC) reply

The editor responsible for that first edit is German. Germany apparently was observing daylight savings time on 13/14 September 2004. Local time for that edit would thus have been UTC+2, 00:06 14 September 2004. Plantdrew ( talk) 17:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC) reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Wikispecies screenshot.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply