Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 ( talk · contribs) 18:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Lead and plot seem fine

Production

• To whom was the project published?
• Maybe mentioning Weaving a Story's title could be fitting for the first paragraph.

Reception

• Everything seems fine but was this the lowest rating so far or there was another one?

The lowest of the lowest!

That's all. Tintor2 ( talk) 18:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Tintor2: Okay, then. Done!-- TeenAngels1234 ( talk) 21:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Will be reviewing this article. Tintor2 ( talk) 18:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. ( reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. ( OR):

   d. ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. ( major aspects):

   b. ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)