This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Indigenous peoples of North America This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Ethnic groups Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the {{ Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 10 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jadamczyk.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

so the washoe people had almost no impact on the land around them. this created a vulnerability for the land to simply be built upon (by european settlers aka the not so distant ancestors of today's american society). this left the washoe without land, food, and shelter, which they needed to survive. and so their only option besides to die was to integrate into the bad-for-the-environment society of the european descended "settlers."

is it just me, or does that suck?

198.189.128.168 22:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I, washo people, want to add information regarding the impact that the Washo people had on the land around them. Our connections to the land, animal, air and water had direct balance with nature created by the practices and the beliefs of the Washo way. For example, places that Washo didn't build permanent structures in, such as meadows and spring areas, were vital to the ecology. All life used these areas, and when people build in those areas life has a difficult time surviving in that environment, and the cycle of life is disrupted. The Washo people took great care in deciding where to build their structures in order to minimize their impact on the ecology. When the Washo people left an area, they would do controlled burns in order to stimulate growth and reduce the fuels to prevent large out of control fires. When hunting or fishing, we would only take the males, allowing the females to continue to populate. Barren does were permissible to hunt even though they are female, they no longer could reproduce.

In modern times, we no longer need to fear for our lives, and we can work to returning to our original responsibilities of managing the land and interpreting our role as care takers for the land and the animals and the water and the air. We can accomplish these goals by teaching people how we Washo understand our places and how we all can help our environment.

Providing information to people about our ways can help to make it not suck. And we are working towards this goal. I hope in the future to add much more content to the wiki page to help spread the information which today's modern day society is lacking. - Dtahtihshmeh ( talk) 07:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The name of the article is currently "Washoe people", but the article text mostly uses "Washo", and the language article is " Washo language". What appears to be the tribe's website spells it "Washoe". Can one or the other be used consistently, with a mention of (and redirects from) the variant spelling? — KCinDC ( talk) 00:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Traditionally, it's always been 'Washoe' and the tribe uses it themselves. An editor has apparently taken it upon themselves to advocate a WP:neologism. - LlywelynII ( talk) 20:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Fix'd per WP:UCN, WP:NEO, WP:UE. Google -wiki shows Washoe with an e is by far more prevalent, although it seems the language/lingual group is called "Washo," witout one. There are scholarly articles in the sources without an e, but before adding it as an alternative name in the lede, it'd be good if someone could check that they aren't referring to the language group but the actual people. - LlywelynII ( talk) 20:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC) reply

the washoe people used to be — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.164.115.254 ( talk) 18:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Washoe people/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 23:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

it is 112ft deep 99.127.124.144 ( talk) 00:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC) reply