This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance). Television: Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of WJZY's studios be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The call letter explanation in the infobox states that the call is derived from WJZ in Baltimore. Was there a connection between the two stations that inspired WJZY's call, or were the anonymous editors that added that derivation just making things up? This needs a source, or out it goes. VT hawkeye _{talk to me} 05:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Upn46logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot ( talk) 02:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply

On July 1, 2013, I plan on deleting File:WJZY CW46.png. Is this overkill? Fairly OddParents Freak ( Fairlyoddparents1234) T | C Member: WP:TVS 20:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC) reply

I have changed to past tense the statement that the station occasionally carried ACC games that WBTV didn't carry. It was even more often the case that WBTV pre-empted CBS Sports for the ACC, and WJZY (as a UPN or CW affiliate) picked up the CBS game. But until proven otherwise, there's no evidence that Fox has continued that relationship with Raycom (WBTV's parent and the distributor of ACC sports) or the secondary affiliation with CBS. If those do turn out to be the case, the language can be changed back to present tense. 71.75.58.134 ( talk) 05:48, 8 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Do not lock pages out of bogus sockpuppetry. Those are NOT TheREALCableGuy's, and you know it, yet you won't listen. Now stop it! 46.246.28.97 ( talk) 21:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Yes, because an unsigned user needs to make this point over four random IPs grabbed over some kind of proxy. It's locked for good reason. Nate • ( chatter) 01:26, 25 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on WJZY. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131021023908/http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/05/09/4033000/charlotte-stations-revealing-branding.html to http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/05/09/4033000/charlotte-stations-revealing-branding.html
• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502223103/http://svtvstations.webs.com/svtvstations.htm to http://svtvstations.webs.com/svtvstations.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004231032/http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/06/13/4104671/a-new-radio-generation-at-cbs.html to http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/06/13/4104671/a-new-radio-generation-at-cbs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Appears to be in 1080p - not 720p as described in the article. -- 24.182.92.247 ( talk) 05:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC) reply

It is not; 1080p is impossible to carry over the air over the current television standard, and Fox is in a 720p format nationally. This is definitely a not-in-doubt issue. Nate • ( chatter) 17:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Likely your TV is outputting a 1080p signal from your pay-TV source and that's why it shows up that way; the local box is upconverting a 720p signal to 1080p (that's what my TiVo does, for instance). Nate • ( chatter) 19:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Danke. -- 24.182.92.247 ( talk) 07:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WJZY. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/pubacc/Auth_Files/1537401.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply