This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 30 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dchild21.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Wouldn't it be appropriate to include a section on the various controversies surrounding bad conditions at VA facilities and other recent scandals and controversies regarding care of veterans and soldiers? nf utvol ( talk) 20:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Only if the controversies are really encyclopedia worthy. See WP:WEIGHT, WP:SOAP, WP:IINFO and others. Antisoapbox ( talk) 16:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC) reply

The first paragraph of this entry seems to read like an advertisement. And as mentioned before, there definitely should be some discussion of the controversies surrounding the organization. I'm not knowledgeable enough to do the editing though... User7145 ( talk) 16:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply

My father, a retiree and POW, received treatment at the VA. Originally, 20 years ago, he was unhappy with their service. The VA revamped their operations about 10 years ago and he said the difference was like night and day. He was VERY pleased with the health care he received.

I have worked in hospitals for nearly 25 years now. Everywhere I hear the horror stories. I remember once a doc amputated the wrong leg on a diabetic male. Man is not perfect and mistakes are going to happen. Just because the VA serves veterans does not mean they are automatically going to be the BEST hospital.

Thank you for not putting in notes of scandals regarding the VA. They do the best job they can with what they have. For the quantity of veterans they serve every year, I think they do a phenomenal job! Hospital worker ( talk) 16:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Might be interesting and notable to show information concerning the rates of malpractice-type problems compared with private medical care. Don't have to criticize, just show the statistics. I'm sure there is an article out there somewhere.-- 119.224.14.7 ( talk) 06:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I agree, there are actually many good sources on the quality of care and the fact that VHA docs aren't subject malpractice issues. I added some info on this and reorganized a bit. Will try to come back to add cite template. Antisoapbox ( talk) 16:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Yes, there are many good sources on VA quality of care, which has been consistently found to be comparable to or better than care in the private sector. They are not difficult to find, and the fact that none of them are reported here says much about the level of bias in this wiki article. Try this for a start: http://www.rand.org/blog/2012/08/socialized-or-not-we-can-learn-from-the-va.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.7.25.154 ( talk) 15:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC) reply

VA Gives phenomenal health care

I appreciate all that the VA does for veterans especially my dad. I do think there is plenty of room for improvement. I have been to appointments and they way that people speak to not only him but other veterans is horrifying! I have had friends that have worked for the VA and after a short period of time because they go in wanting to make a difference and when they where denied the opportunity to do that they had to leave. I feel that there should be facts as to the reason why you feel that the VA gives phenomenal service. Gigi2376 ( talk) 20:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Gigi2376 Gigi2376 ( talk) 20:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC) reply

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+veteran+health+administration&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+veteran+affairs&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_vis=0

-- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 01:23, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=veteran+affair&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

-- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 01:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=veterans+affairs&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

-- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 01:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=geriatrics+veterans+affairs&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=scientific+administration&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

-- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 01:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=scientific+administrations&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

-- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 01:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+%22scientific+administration%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

-- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 01:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

About the topic of Retirement village

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=retirement+village+health&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+retirement+villages+health&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+retirement+village&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+retirement+villages&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

-- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 02:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=%E9%80%80%E4%BC%91%E6%9D%91&num=10&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2%E5%AD%A6%E6%9C%AF&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&hl=zh-CN

-- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 02:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Please do not auto-direct the topic of Retirement village to Retirement community. These two are different concepts, the former is more closely associated with housing and the later social although they are related -- 222.67.207.131 ( talk) 02:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I am creating an article for the topic and would like to add material here also without objection. my proposed edit would include a section on the scandal and or in the electronic records section as the locus of the findings so far are of appointments purposely not entered into record.

• The VA hospital scandal arose from claims 40 vets died waiting for medical care in Phoenix. The President and Eric Shinseki, the secretary of Veterans Affairs, both said they are “mad as hell” about the treatment of sick veterans. the allegations suggest the patients were not put on a doctor waiting list until an appointment could be made in less than 14 days, thus enabling administrators to earn a bonus for timely processing. the scandal has now spread to 9 hospitals.

Congressman McCarthy, said

If the president truly did not know about these scandals and mistakes, we should doubt his ability to properly manage the leviathan government that he helped create.

^[1] Retired VA Dr. Sam Foote described an "official" list and "a sham list" with much longer wait times than the 14 day benchmark, up to 12 months causing several deaths.

they enter information into the computer and do a screen capture hard copy printout. They then do not save what was put into the computer so there's no record that you were ever here,

^[2]

Results

Sharon Helman, director of the Phoenix VA Health Care System, has been placed on leave. ^[3]Robert Petzel, the VA undersecretary for health resigned a day after giving testimony to congress regarding the allegations. ^[4] Rachael Maddow explained the resignation was actually planned before the scandal and will not impact the failures in the V.A. ^[5]Three supervisors of the VA hospital in Gainesville Fl were placed on leave after an audit team found appointments made on paper but not entered into the data network. ^{[6] [7]} Darkstar1st ( talk) 09:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply

• Hi @ Darkstar1st: I have started a new article at Veterans Health Administration scandal of 2014. Please contribute there or contribute more to a summary of information in the VHA article. Thanks! -- Pine ^✉ 07:32, 31 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Veterans Health Administration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060221031414/http://www1.va.gov:80/health/ to http://www.va.gov/health
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080329235717/http://www1.va.gov:80/grecc/ to http://www1.va.gov/grecc/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080427193846/http://www.sci.va.gov:80/ to http://www.sci.va.gov/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC) reply

These are the most recent reviews of the evaluations of the VA system, and therefore the most authoritative:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2664026
November 21, 2017
Advancing High Performance in Veterans Affairs Health Care
David Atkins, MD, MPH1; Carolyn M. Clancy, MD2
JAMA. 2017;318(19):1927-1928.
doi:10.1001/jama.2017.17667
VA hospitals performed better than non-VA hospitals for most outcome measures—including lower rates of inpatient safety events such as pressure ulcer, iatrogenic pneumothorax, and central line–associated bloodstream infection—and lower 30-day mortality and readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (MI), pneumonia, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. At the same time, VA hospitals scored lower for patient experience and behavioral health. The finding that VA hospitals perform better on quality when compared with hospitals in the private sector is not novel. A 2017 review of 69 published studies reported that the VA performed as well as, or better than, private health care systems on most quality measures. Additionally, the VA has higher screening rates for colon cancer (82% vs a national average within the 60% range), has reduced the number of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus infections (infections in the intensive care unit declined 72%, from 1.64 to 0.46/1000 patient-days, 2007-2012), and achieves lower 30-day mortality than private hospitals for patients older than 65 years hospitalized for acute MI and heart failure.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2618816
Research Letter
June 2017
Initial Public Reporting of Quality at Veterans Affairs vs Non–Veterans Affairs Hospitals
Eddie Blay Jr, MD1; John Oliver DeLancey, MD, MPH1; D. Brock Hewitt, MD, MPH1; et al Jeanette W. Chung, PhD1; Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD, MS1
Author Affiliations: Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery and Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(6):882-885.
doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0605
Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) announced the inclusion of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital performance data on its Hospital Compare website.1 Prior to this release, comparisons of quality at VA vs non-VA hospitals were inconclusive and had methodological limitations.2,3 Given longstanding concerns about care at VA hospitals,4 our objective was to compare available outcome, patient experience, and behavioral health measures between VA and non-VA hospitals.
-- Nbauman ( talk) 21:35, 25 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Here's the critical part of the table from Blay that compares mortality from VA and non-VA hospitals. In other words, if you go to a random VA hospital with AMI, you have a 9% chance of death, but if you go to a random non-VA hospital with a matched AMI, you have a 14% chance of death.

Table 1. Outcomes at VA vs Non-VA Hospitals 30-Day Mortality (Rates per 100 Discharges [95% CI])

Outcome	VA Overall	Non-VA
AMI	9.27 (9.0-9.46)	14.10 (14.04-14.15)
PNA	8.67 (8.50-8.84)	16.42 (16.35-16.48)
COPD	6.17 (5.90-6.44)	8.06 (8.03-8.11)
Heart failure	7.78 (7.55-8.01)	12.19 (12.19-12.24)

Abbreviations: AMI, acute myocardial infarction; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PNA, pneumonia -- Nbauman ( talk) 02:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Here's citation 2 from Atkins:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11606-016-3775-2

Comparing VA and Non-VA quality of care: a systematic review.

O'Hanlon C, Huang C, Sloss E, et al.

J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:105-121.

The Veterans Affairs (VA) system was lauded for achieving system-wide improvements in the quality of care during the 1990s and 2000s. More recently it has drawn criticism for poor access to care at some facilities, exacerbated in part by gaming data to achieve quality targets. This systematic review found that VA hospitals provide equally safe care compared to non-VA hospitals across most medical and surgical hospitalizations, and generally (but not always) provided more effective care. The performance and recent challenges faced by the VA system were discussed in a 2014 editorial.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11606-016-3775-2.pdf

10.1007_s11606-016-3775-2.pdf

-- Nbauman ( talk) 02:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC) reply

From edits at 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the United States article:

5 million masks meant for hospitals of the Veterans Health Administration were seized by FEMA and redirected to the federal stockpile, stated Richard Stone, the leader of the agency for veterans, in late April. Employees of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals had been complaining of a lack of protective gear for weeks, but the agency for veterans denied that any shortages existed. The American Federation of Government Employees, which represents many Veterans Affairs employees, stated that nurses are using surgical masks and face shields instead of more protective N95 masks. ^[1]

X1\ ( talk) 02:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC) reply