From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fourth Largest?

That implies there are least 3 other University systems in Texas. That's a lot, even for a big state. A list would be of interest.

4.68.248.231 23:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC) That's right; in addition to the UH System, there are actually five other public university systems in Texas: The University of Texas System; The Texas A&M University System; the Texas State University System; the Texas Tech University System; and the University of North Texas System. reply

The Texas Tech and North Texas systems are not truly multi-campus university systems. Rather, they are both major, independent universities that are also associated with separately accredited, separate-campus medical branches, as well as satellite campuses that are not independent of the main campus.

University of Texas, Texas A&M University, Texas State University and the University of Houston systems are all university systems in the truest sense, with numerous public university campuses in each.

My problem with the main Wikipedia article on the University of Houston System is the claim that it is the largest public "metropolitan" university system in the state. For instance, the University of Texas System -- with its flagship campus in Austin and other large campuses in El Paso, San Antonio, Arlington and Dallas, to name a few -- certainly qualifies as a metropolitan system. 4.68.248.231 23:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Endowment/Budget

I have a question. I was the UH website and it says the budget for FY09 is now 1.2 billion. Would that be the endowment? http://uh.edu/news-events/newsrelease.php?releaseid_int=275 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lostinurpain0 ( talkcontribs) 05:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Nope. A budget is how much a university has to spend. An endowment is how much money a university obtains strictly through donations. Brianreading ( talk) 14:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Dr. Renu Khator info

I don't feel that this information is notable enough to be put on Wikipedia yet. After all, she hasn't even accepted the position yet! Let's wait 'til she does, otherwise it's extraneous. We won't have to wait that long to know anyway! What do you guys think? Brianreading 16:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on University of Houston System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:University of Houston System/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: pass

  • It is referenced, major points are appropriately cited.

Coverage and accuracy: pass

  • It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.

Structure: pass

  • It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.

Grammar: pass

  • It is free from major grammatical errors.

Supporting materials: pass

  • It does contain appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.

Additional comments:

  • Good article, recommend that content be expanded and try for WP:GA class. Postoak ( talk) 05:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Last edited at 05:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on University of Houston System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Capitalization of common nouns

@ Cubbie15fan: Note that "chancellor", "regent" and "board" are common nouns, and do not get capitalized. See MOS:JOBTITLES and MOS:INSTITUTIONS. I will restore the correct use of lower case. Chris the speller  yack 21:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC) reply