This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
That's correct. It's reflected in the article. —
GoldRingChip 20:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The lead
The lead paragraph could use some work.
"Over the years, New York has undergone too much demographic change to consider each district to be a continuation of the same numbered district before reapportionment. For example, Carolyn Maloney has represented the 9th District since 1993, but is considered the successor of S. William Green since the current 9th takes up nearly all of the former territory of the 15th District as it existed before 1993."
"Too much" adds nothing and the whole thing needs to be re-written usiung statistics and sources. It's written in a very informal style.
Howard Cleeves 00:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)reply
MIA
Albert D. Shaw
[1] is missing from the table.--
Appraiser 20:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Thank you for this; I was wondering whether I should go through the time and expense of getting an old reference work to confirm all these tables, and that pretty much cements my decision. --
Golbez 20:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I find the bioguide fairly easy to use and highly accurate. I've been working on the ordinal congresses and leave a note when I find errors in these articles. Editing these tables is a pain. --
Appraiser 17:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Also missing:
Edwin A. Merritt served in the 26th district following the death of George Malby - entry missing.--
Appraiser 16:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Francis B. Harrison served in the 20th district in the 63rd congress before resigning.
Jacob A. Cantor then won a special election to replace him - entry missing.--
Appraiser 15:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Edwin R. Reynolds served in the 36th congress to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Silas Burroughs.--
Appraiser 13:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Thomas C. Ripley served in the 29th congress to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Richard P. Herrick.--
Appraiser 20:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)reply
This is a wonderful list and seems to be directionally correct. I got dinged for a no source citation while writing a list of Congressmen for an individual district based on the list. In checking the 1st district biographies I don't see the reference to some of the two congressmen in one term so it is problematic. In spot checking the other state delegation lists, they all suffer the problem. So, a reference would definitely be helpful!!!! Thanks.
Americasroof 11:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Proposed that this list be split into NYS Senate and NYS House pages, retaining this page as a disambig.
Mbisanz (
talk) 06:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)reply
This proposal needs a whole lot more discussion before it is implemented.--
Appraiser (
talk) 17:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Definitely not a fan. There are already lists of Senators and lists of House members. This page is supposed to be a combination of the two. It's the entire congressional delegations. I support an immediate reversion. Mahalo. --
Ali'i 17:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Go for it, I just did it since it seemed non-controversial and it was getting hard to load over a slow connect/old comp. But if consensus says otherwise, I don't object.
Mbisanz (
talk) 01:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)reply
I would note that the layout and content of the split congressional delegations (House) are different then the simple list of NYS House members. Specifically some of the party names. My logic in splitting it was that it is too large as one page to easily use. One idea might be to split both the house and senate into time periods, using this as a disambig.
Mbisanz (
talk) 02:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)reply
I also object to the splitting. All the other states have their full congressional delegation history on a single page. Singling out New York for a split simply because it's the largest doesn't make sense.
Bjoel5785 19:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Since Bjoel5785's restoration, I've PROD' the redundant splits.
Mbisanz 19:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Split by century
Why not split it by century?
klosterdev (
talk) 06:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)reply
I oppose. There are articles like this for all the states and territories, and consistency is nice. This is a list and lists are "
exceptions to the too long rule"—
Markles 12:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Seat numbering mistakes
Many of the representatives are listed as being from the wrong district. For example, the article has Louise Slaughter as being from the 22nd district, and she is actually from the 28th.
72.88.62.18 (
talk) 18:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)reply
Why are these separate sections given that the state had the same number of seats during each of these periods?
Qqqqqq (
talk) 20:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
United States congressional delegations from New York. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.