From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleUlysses S. Grant is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starUlysses S. Grant is part of the 1880 United States presidential election series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 9, 2015.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 5, 2006 Good article nomineeNot listed
March 25, 2009 Peer reviewReviewed
January 7, 2010 Good article nomineeNot listed
April 11, 2010 Good article nomineeNot listed
October 28, 2010 Good article nomineeNot listed
December 4, 2013 Peer reviewReviewed
December 12, 2013 Good article nomineeListed
July 26, 2014 Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 23, 2015 WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
March 31, 2015 Featured article candidatePromoted
March 2, 2017 Featured topic candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on April 27, 2020, April 27, 2022, and April 27, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

Cotton trade

This article is interesting giving better input on Lincoln, Grant, and the cotton trade.

"In an ironic twist, General Grant saw and condemned the corruption inherent in the trade, but later he became renown for an administration characterized by his associates' corruption. Lincoln oversaw a system whereby his associates gained even at the possible cost of prolonging the war, but we revere him as "Honest" Abe. Lincoln was at least sensitive to the potential scandal from the cotton trade. On some instances he refused to issue permits because of the impropriety involved. Still, the cotton trade, with its attendant profitability, probably posed too great a temptation for any set of men to avoid some sinful behavior; Lincoln was not surrounded by saints."
Source: Traders or Traitors: Northern Cotton Trading During the Civil War David G. Surdam (1999) Department of Economics Loyola University of Chicago

Long article

What areas of the article are too long? There was a tag added to the article saying the article was too long. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 02:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The editor that placed that tag has placed them on several articles. It's frustrating when someone places such a "drive-by" tag without doing enough analysis even to suggest ways of shortening the article. I say this while acknowledging that the article ought to be shorter. But someone has to sit down with it and figure out how that's going to happen. Bruce leverett ( talk) 04:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The Civil War and presidency sections are the areas that would benefit most significantly, although the rest should not be neglected. Nikkimaria ( talk) 04:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The Shiloh and Vicksburg sections possibly could be reduced or resummarized. Maybe that would be enough to get the tag removed. I would keep all the sources and references. Just a narration trim. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 02:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The introduction section looks a lot better in the recent editing. Cmguy777 ( talk) 02:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply
This article may be too long to read and navigate comfortably.
Please consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or adding subheadings. 152.166.156.103 ( talk) 15:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply
To be totally clear, this is currently the longest featured article on the site by a wide margin. 18k words is well past the point where one should really be miffed about drive-by tagging, imo. Remsense 15:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Correction: it's #2, behind Douglas MacArthur (19.2k) and ahead of History of Poland (1945–1989) (17.2k). Remsense 15:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply
I am sincerely thankful for, as well as amused by, this bit of trivia. But again, we are in drive-by mode.
This article became FA in March of 2015 (long before I was involved). I don't know what the word count was back then, but the source size was about 134K bytes, whereas now, 9 years and more than 8K edits later, it is closer to 228K bytes, and the word count is 19K. How much better is the article for all that labor and additional text? Well, in Wikipedia, you can't officially get any better than FA.
Bloat doesn't happen by itself. Every superfluous sentence was added by an editor who thought it was necessary, and in most cases, these were experienced editors, and some of them are still around, still keeping an eye on the article. Everything that is removed to get down to "reasonable" size is going to be fought for. Bruce leverett ( talk) 23:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply
I've added something which should honestly be on every substantial article's talk page, which just shows the byte count per section, it's a good grounding mechanism. Remsense 02:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Thanks Remsense. The Shiloh and Vicksburg campaign sections are good places to start to reduce. Your addition of the byte per section counter is good. That way progress can be evaluated on the article reduction. Cmguy777 ( talk) 05:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply
No, thank you! I am intimidated by this article, frankly, so I'm glad the little technicality I could contribute is helping others, even if I don't have anything more insightful to suggest. Remsense 05:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • As an older editor on this article, I think it's great, some editors are pairing it down. Alanscottwalker ( talk) 18:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2024

In the "Surrender of Lee and Union victory (1865)" subsection of the Civil War section, there is a photo with a caption, the caption should be changed from "Defeated by Grant, Lee surrendered at the Appomattox Court House." to "Defeated by Grant, Lee surrendered at Appomattox Court House." or "Defeated by Grant, Lee surrendered at the McLean house at Appomattox Court House."

Appomattox Court House is the name of the town where the surrender took place, not the name of the building where the surrender took place, so saying "the Appomattox Court House" is incorrect here.

Thanks!

Dylan Dglenn26 ( talk) 22:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done Egsan Bacon ( talk) 22:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply