Talk:U.S._Route_501 References

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways / South Carolina Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. Highways
Locations	South Carolina
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article does not require a junction list.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: North Carolina / Myrtle Beach Stub‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina - Myrtle Beach.

Proposed merge with U.S. Route 501 in South Carolina

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge the 3 relevant state pages into U.S. Route 501 per WP:USRD/3STATE. Klbrain ( talk) 19:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Per WP:USRD/3STATE, an article should only have state-detail articles if the main article would be difficult to maintain due to length. The entire length of US 501 is 355 miles, so length should not really be a factor. – Fredddie ™ 23:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Comment - Do you plan to merge back North and South Carolina into the main article? Keep in mind the sordid past of US 501 in NC being originally together with US 15 and the desire of other editors wanting to break-out states because... reasons... Assuming you'll be doing the merging, what safeguards will be to make sure another editor doesn't show-up a few years down the road and break it out again or re-merge with US 15 (I had to fight a couple of editors on that in the past). -- WashuOtaku ( talk) 00:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply

I would merge all three state-detail articles to here. I'm coming up with a gameplan. I wouldn't half-ass it. – Fredddie ™ 00:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Support Needforspeed888 ( talk) 06:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Oppose -- There are too many details, primarily in Virginia. The other states can and should be expanded. ------- User:DanTD ( talk) 04:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Support merger based on current state of the articles. One article should be able to handle a 355-mile highway, even when fully expanded. However, I would not be opposed to splitting again if an expanded article is bursting at the seams. Dough 4872 01:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger complete. Klbrain ( talk) 20:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply

If we were following the rules, the merge proposal would have failed months ago; not wait over a year later to getting a second person to agree then suddenly make it happen. Amused how it was not integrated in the merging, it's basically three articles slapped together. -- WashuOtaku ( talk) 20:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I have cleaned up the merged article by combining the junction lists and infoboxes together along with cleaning up the route description a bit. Dough 4872 00:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply