It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout ✓Pass
Practically everything is attributed to a reliable source. No problems here --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)
It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines ✓Pass
It addresses each area of coverage required by the MOS and covers each in detail. --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail ✓Pass
Maintains a real-world frame and stays on topic throughout the article. --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)
Neutral
Tt represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. ✓Pass
Not as much of an issue with fiction articles, but no it is not written from a fan POV. The tone is appropriate too. --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)
Stable
it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. ✓Pass
While major work on this article occured this month, there has been no real content disputes or edit wars. This article is undeniably much better. --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)
Illustrated, if possible, by images
images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content ✓Pass
All images have appropriate rationales and don't appear to be in question. --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. ✓Pass
All are captioned, and directly relate to commentary. --Kraftlos(
Talk |
Contrib)