This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
I have a feeling the picture is actually the Klamath River upstream of Weitchpec... look in Google Street view, the CA96 bridge over the Klamath, looking upstream... it looks suspiciously like the top image on this page.
Shannontalkcontribs 04:51, 11 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes, it looks remarkably the same. Here's a link to the Google street view image from the bridge:
[1]. Compare to the photo used on this page,
[2].
Pfly (
talk) 07:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Trinity Dam
There's one dam between Trinity Lake and Lewiston Lake. Trinity Lake is man-made and was formed by damming the Trinity River just above where it flowed into Lewiston Lake. Lewiston Lake is a natural lake. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
171.159.192.10 (
talk) 21:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Images are all fine--some of them are quite beautiful. No licensing issues.
No edit wars, article is stable.
No POV problems.
Streamflow
You could lose the phrase "It is worth noting that" without changing the meaning of the sentence. Same with "Also of note is". Just including these facts in an encyclopedia article testifies to their noteworthiness.
It's a little confusing where you say "Their name for the Trinity River was hun' simply meaning "river"." But then in the next sentence "The origin of their name for the Trinity River, Hoopa or Hupa, is uncertain." So, which was the river's name, "hun'" or "Hoopa"?
Fixed. It seemed to be missing a sentence there.
Shannon 00:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Post-Gold Rush settlement
"The Forest Service was criticized for mismanaging timber lands in the area...." Who criticized them?
I added the names of the environmental groups who filed a lawsuit, and a source.
Shannon 00:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Sources
Are footnotes 20 and 55 the same source? If so, the notes could be combined.
This is an excellent article and, once these minor issues are resolved, I look forward to promoting it to Good Article. --
Coemgenus (
talk) 14:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)reply
I think that's everything. I'll promote this right away. Thanks for writing it, it was a pleasure to read and review. --
Coemgenus (
talk) 16:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the review! I really appreciate your help.
Shannon 16:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply