From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redundancy with other articles

I've cut the scope of this article way down as it was basically a duplication of all five (5) of the articles drawn from herein, which are now referenced via main artice links at the top of each section heading. IMO, for this article to be of any value it should speak to the broad subject of public transit in San Diego County as a whole, and not simply regurgitate information on each separate transit system.-- Lord Kinbote 23:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC) reply

  • Response

The article was meant for in-depth info on public transit in San Diego county.Your modifications destroys the whole purpose of the article and gives very little information on the systems.-- cooljuno411

I don't intend to pursue this as I have no vested interest in the article, only to further stress the point that each one of the entities you reference already has a full-blown article and therefore doesn't require such in-depth treatment herein (hence the purpose of the main article links). And, based on what you describe, the article should be entitled Public transportation in San Diego County, California, and should mention the various bus systems as well. Good luck.-- Lord Kinbote 04:35, 15 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Shouldn't this be called "Public Transportation in San Diego County"?

I think the title of this article is wrong. Will ( Talk - contribs) 04:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply