This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Oklahoma: Tulsa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Task-force Tulsa (assessed as Low-importance).

I think this article could be moved to Tracy Park Historic District. The word (Tulsa) seems like unnecessary disambiguation, since there are no other articles about a Tracy Park Historic District. User:Bruin2, as the article's author, what do you think? -- MelanieN ( talk) 22:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC) reply

MelanieZ, thanks for your reply. I had started with the title you propose, but added Tulsa, since some other Tracy Parks showed up during my searches on Google. The disambiguation was more for the convenience of future authors and users. However, I don't have an objection to dropping the parenthetical expression if WP usage rules it is inappropriate. Bruin2 ( talk) 22:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Even though there are other Tracy Parks, there does not appear to be any other Tracy Park Historic District, so the name seems unique - and seems to be a distinctive enough name even if some of the other places named Tracy Park eventually get articles. I will go ahead and move it. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC) reply