This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Hanna-Barbera Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Hanna-Barbera work group (assessed as High-importance). Comics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archive 2003-2009

In the Characters section, there is no information given on the main character, Top Cat. Somebody might want to add a character summary for T.C. Safiel ( talk) 03:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply

It makes no sense for there not to be a character description of the main character, Top Cat. -- Hoppybunny ( talk) 18:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC) reply

While I'd be delighted if there are solid plans to 'reboot' Top Cat as a feature film, Wikipedia is not a blog and therefore requires reliable sources (see WP:RS) for this information. If none are forthcoming I'll see what I can come up with, and if I can't the section will have to go per WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks. Jusdafax 15:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply

A new film version of Top Cat is in post-production of a Mexico-Argentina co-production slated for release in September 2011. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1821680/ ZirKarloz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.129.118.140 ( talk) 08:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

A few weeks ago I happened upon an 'Analysis' section in the Yogi Bear article which struck me as being out of place given that it contained an application of Critical Theory to a subject not related to this field. Since Critical Theory is a decidedly non-neutral paradigm this was very much out of place in the article on a cartoon bear. I also noticed the section had been removed and re-instated several times with justifications which themselves violated NPOV by claiming that the material was relevant to the subject. I therefore added a note to the talk page for the article and removed the section with the admonition to justify a re-instatement in some way. The section was re-instated without justification so I removed it a second time, again asking for a justification why this clear NPOV violation should be upheld. Given the strange combination of subject matter - critical theory applied to cartoon figures - I decided to check whether this NPOV violation occurred in other articles, which it turned out it does. Since Wikipedia is not a political action platform these sections have no place here. I will therefore remove the 'Analysis' section with the stated justification. If another editor wants to revert this removal he or she should justify this in some way by explaining why an expression of political activism has a place in a Wikipedia entry on a cartoon figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yetanwiki ( talk • contribs) 23:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Wiki has a POV...what's the point in fighting it? 71.162.113.226 ( talk) 11:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply

shouldnt this article have a secton about it's ending and or cancellation?

69.236.176.15 ( talk) 05:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Top Cat Kellogg's commercial 1 (c. 1961).webm

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC) reply