A request has been made for this article to be
peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tiger article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Tiger is a former
featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the
archive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to
Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing
the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Malaysia and
Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bhutan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indonesia and
Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Tiger is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all
Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the
Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please
join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the
Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please
join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please add a third paragraph in the "In captivity" section:
The average lifespan of a tiger in the wild is a maximum of about 15 years. Tigers in captivity live between 20 and 25 years, with an average lifespan of 22 years. The lifespan increases when in captivity because they are protected from the majority of natural threats. Tigers in captivity are also less likely to die from disease due to regular medical care and a consistent supply of food.
Source:
https://wildlifetrip.org/how-long-do-tigers-live/2601:191:280:A60:0:0:0:D4B9 (
talk) 18:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Not done Since this source is a blog, I am going to deny this request. If you can find a
reliable source to support this, I will make the update. (Blogs are generally not regarded as reliable sources.) -
UtherSRG(talk) 19:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The Bornean tiger: Panthera tigris sondaica / borneensis?
If
Douchan Gersi and the natives of
Borneo are to be believed, then there is (or was) one population or subspecies of tigers which the
Cat Specialist Group have not taken into consideration, that is the
Bornean tiger. Since the island of Borneo is the
largest of the
Sunda Islands, this is geographically a
Sunda Island tiger (like its
Sumatran,
Balinese and
Javan relatives, which the CSG grouped under the
trinomial nomenclaturePanthera tigris sondaica in 2017), so I wonder what will happen to the
species' taxonomy, should a wild tiger ever be found in Borneo, which is genetically different from the Sumatran, Javan and Balinese tigers?
Leo1pard (
talk) 05:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC); edited 07:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Since the Bornean tiger page is linked and provides lots of details, it is not necessary to replicate this content here. I therefore shortened the respective paragraph. –
BhagyaMani (
talk) 08:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2023
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Hi team.
I want to Change the link of single Content. Want to point on original website.
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
"change X to Y" format and provide a
reliable source if appropriate.
CMD (
talk) 06:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2023
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
May I please check your grammar? Because it might have some mistakes and I would love to correct them I have excellent grammar and punctuation. I've written a tremendous essay and if people came to read this they might find some errors on this Topic about Tigers, plus people might wonder what that word could mean and waste their time this is my suggestion for me to rewrite it to make it better, nicer, cleaner topic and I hope you let me this is my plea to rewrite some of this topic.
Hi Abu Bakr Bah, this article is semi-protected which means a very small level of prior contribution is needed to edit it. In the meantime, you can note specific changes here which can be acted on. Best,
CMD (
talk) 11:40, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
FA
I'll be working this one soon. Anybody want to join me?
LittleJerry (
talk) 22:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is far from meeting the FA criteria, but I can assist with the section on cultural depictions.
20 upper (
talk) 12:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I plan on changing/rewritting the culture section into a smaller subsection and moving the information currently there to a new article "Cultural depictions of tigers".
LittleJerry (
talk) 18:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I'd suggest merging
Tigers in Chinese culture and
Tigers in Korean culture into
Cultural depictions of tigers. Overall, I don't think this article is too badly off, but there is definitely room for improvement. There are three fossil subspecies not mentioned at all, and there's the elephant in the room of the number of subspecies- the IUCN says two, but the majority of recent papers I've seen go with nine. I'm not sure there needs to be a separate subsection just for size, and there's a bit too much on the color variations given each has their own (admittedly poor) article. I'd prefer more of the Description section to talk about other parts of the animal than just the size and color/pattern. Conservation section's a mess.
Sorry for the list of critiques, but I hope it helps. Happy editing,
SilverTiger12 (
talk) 19:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
My plan is to comb through each section and subsection, making sure the text accurately reflect the sources and making changes, trims and rewrites along the way. Don't have the energy to rewrite from scratch like I did with polar bear.
LittleJerry (
talk) 19:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The tiger has a pretty typical felid build. The most distinctive things are its size and coloration.
LittleJerry (
talk) 03:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I saw your initial question, but thought that somebody else may want to press forward. But since you invite me directly : I'm on board. You and I are anyway the 2 main contributors. I agree to check the sections before nominating this for FA. –
BhagyaMani (
talk) 10:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
SilverTiger12 what other papers support the six subspecies? Also,
BhagyaMani do you have information on the three fossil subspecies?
LittleJerry (
talk) 17:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)reply
No, I don't have anything offline on these 3 fossil ones. –
BhagyaMani (
talk) 21:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't keep up with tiger research, but when I search "tiger subspecies" of Google Scholar I get a lot of papers that refer to nine subspecies. The 3 fossil subspecies are pretty obscure, alas.
I am considering opening discussion regarding the number of supporting articles: namely
black tiger,
life cycle of the tiger,
tiger hunting,
tiger conservation, and
tiger attack, all of which I feel are unnecessary splits. Black tiger is mostly an exhaustive listing of sightings; the rest seem over-detailed.
Tiger conservation is definitely notable enough to be its own article.
LittleJerry (
talk) 00:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)reply
BhagyaMani could you add information on the territory sizes from different areas cited to peer-reviewed arrticle like you did for red panda?
LittleJerry (
talk) 15:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)reply
BhagyaMani, nice job. Could you work on the conservation section? Thank you.
LittleJerry (
talk) 21:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Not quite ready yet, but will add some info on home range in Sumatra + India in the next few days, so that at least the main range countries are covered. Will also make a new map asap. –
BhagyaMani (
talk) 22:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
SilverTiger12, why did you redirect Panthera tigris tigris to this article? Why not also Panthera tigris sondaica?
LittleJerry (
talk) 05:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
A) To redirect it to a place where the subspecies question is actually explained. B) I got called away from the computer and then forgot.
SilverTiger12 (
talk) 15:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
BhagyaMani, going forward, you work on Conservation and Body Part Use (or maybe you'll replace the latter with "Threats"?). I'll look at the rest. I definitely want to rewrite the culture section.
LittleJerry (
talk) 17:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
SilverTiger12, given several recent genetic studies, I think each subspecies article should atleast introduce them as "subspecies or population".
LittleJerry (
talk) 16:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The Bornean and Palawanese tigers
It is scientifically proven that tigers existed in the
Sunda Islands of
Borneo and
Palawan, at least in prehistoric times. The real question is whether or not the
Bornean tiger survived into the modern age! One evidence for this is the fact that
indigenous Borneans are familiar with the tiger! If the Bornean tiger had
gone extinct in prehistoric times, like
cave lions and
saber-toothed cats, then it wouldn't make sense that Bornean natives would still be familiar with it!
Leo1pard (
talk) 07:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC); edited 07:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't know. Does it really matter? I thought that users could write in whatever dialect of English they wanted.
Leo1pard (
talk) 15:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC); edited 15:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)reply
This is UK English, since that is what India uses.
LittleJerry (
talk) 14:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The current black tiger article is mostly a list of sightings and supposed sightings of black or mostly black tigers; there is exactly one scholarly source present. There is no evidence for the notability of "black tigers" as a group, so I suggest that discussion of them can be condensed into a single paragraph under
Tiger#Colour variations.
SilverTiger12 (
talk) 23:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I would support this. But I don't think we should move the "sightings" reports to this article. If there are more scientific papers on black tigers then sure.
LittleJerry (
talk) 14:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I would count an article by RI Pocock in the Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society as a scholarly article. I've complete the citation with a link to BHL. There are several other JBNHS citations which could be valid if we can trace them properly. — Jts1882 |
talk 17:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The problem is that these are very small sources; the one by Pocock has only two paragraphs about reported black tigers, for instance.
SilverTiger12 (
talk) 22:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I agree to NOT moving all the many details from newspapers + websites in this page here. But maybe the ref to Pocock's article + one on the 'black' tigers in Simlipal NP, which I have in my library. —
BhagyaMani (
talk) 22:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, I figured only a very small amount of information on black tigers would survive the merge- certainly not the exhaustive, non-encyclopedic list of sightings and births.
SilverTiger12 (
talk) 23:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Facts about their stripes and their smell of urine.
I wonder of these sources are reliable enough.
Shy Aroace (
talk) 12:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Tiger weight
@
LittleJerry: just a quick note. Siberian tigers don't weigh 306 kg; not even the largest ones. According to my own experience, male Siberians average 174 kg and females 113 kg, with both sexes having a maximum weight of 200 kg and 140 kg, respectively. The only Siberians that are likely to reach such weights are captive animals; I believe this table does not include weights from captive animals. The table should show the normal weight range of the tiger, and a 300 kg individual is not normal. Historically, yes, Siberians were the largest, but not anymore; the Bengal is now the largest big cat on average. Take my word for it.
20 upper (
talk) 18:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)reply