From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

Any reason why (Thomas Mensah) article was deleted, i would like to have a better idea of any copyright violations that took place in it as from the editor point of view? Oarabile Mudongo ( talk) 08:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Promotionalism and Sourcing

Peacock phrases without a reliable and third party source to describe his patents should be used. Details of his life and where he studied unless sourced should not be added. An example is telling how critical his patents are with no source to back that up equals promotionalism. He seems to be notable enough without adding a bunch of peacock terms. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 21:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC) reply

-- Oralofori ( talk) 22:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC) I appreciate your inputs User:Hell in a Bucket but my changes are not intended to be promotional so before you revert them again to represent the grammatical/punctuational/factual errors that my changes seeks to correct, please re-read it and them make your changes based on careful observation... thanks and I look forward to seeing your review this time because I appreciate your inputs so make them based on objectivity :-) reply

Claim of paid editing

The claim of paid editing tag that was added today is in reference to Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2020_January_24#Company_offer_to_create_Wikipedia_Page_for_Money_(Fraud)-- Srleffler ( talk) 18:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC) reply