| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Link20XX ( talk · contribs) 20:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello! As soon as I saw that you nominated such a classic manga series, I knew I had to review it. Sorry about missing an unreliable source in the last GA review I did for you. I will start shortly. Link20XX ( talk) 20:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Morgan695: I have completed my initial review. Great job overall, just a few things before it can be promoted.
Checklist
Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
Lede and infobox:
- "teenage vampire, from the 18th to 21st centuries" I don't believe a comma is needed here.4
- Revised.
- There should be no small text in the Infobox per
MOS:SMALL.
- Done.
-
Monthly Flowers is a Josei magazine, so shouldn't both Shojo and Josei be listed as demographics, like in
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure?
- Done.
Development:
- "one-shot" should be spelled with a dash. There are a few occasions in this section it is spelled without one
- Done.
- "The series resumed publication in January 1975, with eight chapters published in Bessatsu Shōjo Comic and one chapter in Shūkan Shōjo Comic. Chapters were serialized at an irregular pace until the conclusion of the series in June 1976" is not stated on page 76 of their report, unless I missed it.
- Corrected.
- "Hagio subsequently wrote an additional chapter of Hare no Yume, which was published in the May 2017 issue of Monthly Flowers; both chapters were collected as a hardcover published in July 2017." Unless I missed it, this is not stated in source 21.
- Corrected.
Media:
- Amazon says the first volume was published in May 1974, not March
- Corrected.
- Reference 39 appears to redirect to the main page. You may need to get the archive url.
- Corrected.
- ([43][44][45][46][47][48]) is
WP:TOOMANYREFS. You may need to
WP:CITEBUNDLE them.
- Done.
Reception and legacy:
- Unless I missed it, the source does not say the series won the Shogakukan manga award, and instead says
Golgo 13 won the award with They Were Eleven.
- Corrected.
- Some more critics' reviews should be added to this section, there are very few currently. There is a list of reviews on the talk page.
- Done.
That is all. Address the issues above and I will pass it. Link20XX ( talk) 23:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)