This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Florida Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mountains Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other sources state that Iron Mountain is the highest point, at 325 feet above sea level:

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/keyword/sugarloaf-mountain

This needs to be re-checked. Ryoung122 21:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Iron Mountain is not 325. According to USGS 7.5' Topo Quads (view at Topoquest), highest point is 295 feet. GNIS lists Iron Mountain at 289 feet, based on 1979 entry. Nasa's SRTM data also shows nothing greater than the 290s around Iron Mountain. I would trust the government sources over the Orlando Sentinel, seeing as the paper already made the mistake of listing Sugarloaf Mountain over 1000 feet... Sentinel's editor's need to work on their fact finding. Lithium6ion ( talk) 01:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC) reply

in addition Ryoung, the article you link to is a letter to the editor, not an article of the Sentinel itself. So some John Doe after seeing a column claiming sugarloaf mountain was > 1,000 corrected the columnist with innacurate information. -- TimL ( talk) 06:20, 27 July 2012 (UTC) reply