This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
Consider joining this project's
Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are
transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
A point about names
see article
Sugar refinery.--Shlok 15:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
A sugar refinery is a factory on the basis of raw sugar, whereas a can sugar mill processes raw sugar cane to produce raw sugar. A cane sugar mill is therefore upstream of a sugar refinery.
Elmschrat (
talk) 08:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Further Processing
In the section about Further Processing, the article says "The cane juice is next mixed with lime to adjust its pH to 7." but it didn't previously explain how the juice was produced. Can someone clarify this in the article? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
73.225.61.79 (
talk) 20:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Requested move 10 February 2017
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not Moved. The compelling argument below is the avoidance of ambiguity not common name. Nothing is gained by removing "cane" from the title as that is the subject of the topic. The
sugar mill redirect is sufficient to get readers in the right place.
Mike Cline (
talk) 11:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Support the move, Sugar mill sounds more natural.
Wayne Jayes (
talk) 09:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose – The problem with 'sugar mill' is that 'sugar' is not what is milled. This article is clearly about cane mills, and does not, for example, include information about
sugar beet mills. If one is British, one might remember the great
British Sugar factories of the past. Therefore, I'm going to 'oppose' this on
WP:PRECISE grounds. Either the scope of the article has to change, or a
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC case has to be put forward.
RGloucester —
☎
Where I live, there are sugar mills everywhere. Never in my life have I heard one referred to as a "sugar cane mill". This is exemplified by the 20 time greater search rate for "sugar mill". I believe
WP:COMMONNAME is important here.
Laurdecltalk 20:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
If you live in Australia, which your user page seems to indicate, that would be because your source of sugar is cane. That's not the case in Europe, and in other parts of the world, where sugar beet is used. COMMONNAME does not apply, because 'sugar mill' is ambiguous. 'Sugar mill' may be found more than 'sugar cane mill' in such Google searches merely because 'sugar mill' is broader than 'sugar cane mill', including the likes of mills that mill sugar beet. This article does not deal with sugar beet, only with cane.
RGloucester —
☎ 21:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
I'm still not seeing it. Most sources I find write "sugar mill" (e.g.
[1]) and if the concept of a sugar mill is different to the concept of a sugar cane mill then why is
sugar mill a redirect? I don't think beet accounts for the 20 time greater search rate. If
sugar beet mills are are common thing, where is our article?
Laurdecltalk 23:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The refining process and the milling process are different things. Regardless, I am not claiming, at all, the sugar beet milling is more common than cane milling. All that I am saying is that the content of this article deals specifically with cane, and therefore, can't see the advantage in moving to an ambiguous title. For example, if the lead of this article were changed to say "A sugar mill can refer to a factory that processes sugar cane to produce raw or white sugar", that'd be an incorrect statement, as they also process sugar beet. Like I said, if the page move goes through, the scope of the article will have to change to include beet.
RGloucester —
☎ 00:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
possibly not relevant but what is the name of the 'device' that grinds sugar crystals into icing (powder) sugar? Are they mills. Might a hat note or two be needed.
GraemeLeggett (
talk) 21:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The common English name for these mills in the U.S. (another major English-speaking country) is simply "cane mill" (though it could be for sorghum as well).
[2] The current title best assures readers they have reached the correct article. —
AjaxSmack 02:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
It isn't. Look at
Google Trends – Sugar mill is Googled thirty times more than cane mill.
Laurdecltalk 03:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Luckily,
Wikipedia is not a compendium of web searches; it's an encyclopedia. Of course "sugar mill" was a more common search term because it applies to numerous toponyms and business names of no encyclopedic merit. Of the top 50 Google.com (US) hits for "sugar mill", only about 5 (i.e., 10%) referred to an actual sugar mill. —
AjaxSmack 04:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
I'm aware of
WP:NOT, but IMO
WP:COMMONNAME is in favour of "sugar mill". Regardless of the search results, I believe the people searching aren't looking for businesses. We are building an online encyclopaedia and we want to make our articles use names with the most hits.
Laurdecltalk 04:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
On what do you base your interpretation of Google results? My understanding is that Google results rankings reflect what people are generally looking for. If most of the hits are toponyms or businesses than it follows that's what Google users are searching for. I fail to understand how search engine results for Google, which is not an encyclopedia, should dictate a title at Wikipedia when said topic is not even the target of the vast majority of Google users. In other words, 90% of Google users who type "sugar mill" are not looking for the subject of the
sugar cane mill article; why should that be the impetus for this move. —
AjaxSmack 06:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
What I'm trying to say is that the results aren't representative of what people are looking for. IMO the people googling "sugar mill" are looking for this article (that's how I'm here), which is lower down in the results because of the obscure and barely search title.
Laurdecltalk 07:32, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment –
Here is another source that refers to them as "sugar mills".
Laurdecltalk 05:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.