This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mountains Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help! Oregon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Little Mountain 5 ( talk · contribs) has suggested this article be merged with Strawberry Mountain Wilderness. I kind of follow the reasoning: a lot of the same geography and features are in common, and they serve similar purposes: recreation, wildlife, etc. On the other hand, it would be silly to combine Mount Hood with Mount Hood Wilderness because those articles are focused on different aspects of the mountain. Presumably, future work on these articles (Strawberry Mountain & Wilderness) would help distinguish them in the same way. It seems I'm mildly opposed to a merger. — EncMstr 03:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC) reply

• Mild oppose Per EncMstr. For categorization purposes, if nothing else, I'd like to see the articles stay separate, but wouldn't stop anyone with a stronger opinion. I'd like to see the nominator's rationale for the merger. Note that there's nothing inherently wrong with geographic stubs and that geographic features like mountains are almost always considered notable. Also, if anything were to be merged, I think it makes more sense to merge Strawberry Mountain (Oregon) with Strawberry Mountains. Katr67 ( talk) 18:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC) reply

I see your point. I was thinking that two articles covering the same area should be merged, but after seeing other articles, I'll take the merger proposal off. Little Mountain 5 ( talk) 23:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC) reply