Stage works of Paul Goodman (
final version) received a
peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 2 April 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
There isn't a great convention for this type of split, so I went with "Stage works of" to follow the parallel format of "
Poetry of" and "Works of", which are already in wide use. I found this preferable to
Paul Goodman stage works. I also found stage works preferable to plays (which they are mostly, except for a musical and some better described as verse dramas). czar 00:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. Sorry for the long wait! If you have any questions, feel free to ask them here. —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 15:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)reply
This article meets the GA standard! Congrats to you and anyone else who may have worked on it. —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 11:50, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
As is my usual practice, I have made minor tweaks myself to save us both time. If there are any you do not agree with, just let me know.
Ok, the Faustina drama: Malina's lover was in therapy with Goodman, and Goodman + the lover had an affair? The sentence isn't very clear. Does the lover have a name?
"After Bovasso" - After Bovasso what? Does this mean she only did the closing speech once?
Did he receive his PhD in 1940 or 1954? The sentence isn't clear.
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline.
Pass, no issues here.
2b.
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
Sources are all reliable academic sources or reputable journalistic pieces. Pass.
I like the dust jacket images, I didn't know about that exception! Those images seem fine, as well as the statue.
However, I'm not convinced that the two images by Charles Rotmil were properly released in a way that means we can use them, nor do I see any direct evidence that the Bavasso image is CC0. Did the Village Voice release their whole photo archive at some point? Please let me know your thoughts on these three.
Thanks for the review! re: images, it was a small epiphany when I realized that some book jacket (promotional) images were freely licensed. For the Living Theatre portraits, I'm inclined to grandfather them in per
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Early uploads policy but I also wouldn't contest it if they were put up for deletion. Bavasso is a crop of
File:Julie Bavasso 1956.JPG, which has links showing it was a promotional image published without a copyright mark. czar 02:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The Bavasso image looks good. As to the Living Theatre portraits, I'm not going to nominate them for deletion, but I regret to say that they should probably be removed from this article for it to get to GA - I don't like to have that kind of copyright uncertainty for articles at the GA standard. —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 13:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Czar just a few things to fix and then we should be about there! Let me know when you'll be able to address them. —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 19:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks, @
Ganesha811. Clarified the above in prose. The major productions list is reasonably complete, having worked from the academic bibliography of Goodman (Nicely 1979). Bovasso quit after "a few" performances so I didn't see fit to specify that or the lover's name.
Also I was thinking about taking this article to FAC, seeing as it is the most complete treatment written on the topic. Any further suggestions? czar 03:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I don't have specific suggestions to take it to FAC, though I'm sure there will be changes needed. The level of scrutiny there, as you know, is significantly higher, but I'm sure you can get this article through the process. It's in very good shape overall. —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 11:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.