This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Energy High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. California This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The non-cited claim in this article that 90% of electrical output comes from sunlight does not jive with reports I've seen that 25% of the SEGS plants have been allowed to derive from fossil fuels.

The following is from the U.S. DOE's EERE website; https://www1.eere.energy.gov/ba/pba/pdfs/solar_trough.pdf

"Note, even though only 25% of the annual energy input to the plant comes from natural gas, since this energy is converted only at the highest turbine cycle efficiency, 34% of the annual electric output from the plant comes from gas energy. "

If someone has some reliable reference that indicates something far different than this cited percentage, I would be grateful to know where that is.

Wikibearwithme ( talk) 23:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Why are images that tell part of the story not allowed? This is really silly. Jcwf ( talk) 21:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC) reply

The objection seems to be to images without accompanying text. To reinstate the images, you might write a short section which describes the sub-topic which the image conveys. If there is no clear corresponding sub-topic, then this indicates that the image may indeed be redundant. Colonel Warden ( talk) 08:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Why is it so big compared to the area of the site? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.237.64.150 ( talk) 14:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply

It isn't. Check the unit - one is listed in square meters and the other in square kilometers. Rmhermen ( talk) 02:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Still there is something weird though, if you add up the areas on the table they add up to something lik 2km^2 while it says 6.5km^2 in introduction. Maybe one is just mirror area and the other land area? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.175.32.254 ( talk) 16:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Agreed - this article is quite deficient in defining its terminology ("site" vs "field" vs collecting area, "name plate capacity" is at 1kW/m2 on mirror area? "capacity factor" is determined precisely from what?). The normal-incidence aperture dimensions of the mirrors would also allow one to obtain an idea of what the performance is, but one simply can't do it with this little defined. I edited article to include the following: The term "field area" is assessed as the actual collector area. Wikibearwithme ( talk) 19:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Information found here says that the SEGS are owned by three separate bodies as:

1. SEGS I & II
2. SEGS III, IV, V, VI, VII
3. SEGS VIII & IX

It also says that No.2 is collectively called SEGS 3 through 7, and that it is owned by the Kramer Junction Company. Could someone add this information to the article? I'll add if it hasn't been in a while. Thanks. Rehman^{( +)} 12:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply

SEGS 3 Through 9 is now owned by Florida Power And Light and operate under Nextera Energy Resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.112.24.99 ( talk) 20:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Could someone add separate coordinates for each of the nine units in the table? I've tried but came up with no luck in finding the information. Rehman^{( +)} 12:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply

An image used in this article, File:LS3 solar collector assembly at Kramer Junction.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC) reply

An image used in this article, File:Mr Twister mirror washing machine.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC) reply

It would be very intersting to find out what these plants cost, for people interested in the economics of solar energy. I'll see if I can find any information. DonPMitchell ( talk) 21:30, 20 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Solar Energy Generating Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://ewh.ieee.org/r6/las_vegas/IEEELASVEGASMAY2006.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020034143/http://www.ornl.gov/sci/engineering_science_technology/world/renewable/Trough%20Technology%20-%20Algeria2.pdf to http://www.ornl.gov/sci/engineering_science_technology/world/renewable/Trough%20Technology%20-%20Algeria2.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130516135750/http://www.cogentrix.com/plants.aspx?id=15 to http://www.cogentrix.com/plants.aspx?id=15
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170213030857/http://www.desertdispatch.com/article/20150425/NEWS/150429961 to http://www.desertdispatch.com/article/20150425/NEWS/150429961

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC) reply