This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Finance and
Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Proposal: merge this information onto main skewness page
This information does not stand alone. It both depends and expands upon the information present in the main article. Logically, it should be part of that article. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
198.103.184.76 (
talk) 17:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC).reply
Risk should not be included in mathematical/statistical definition
Skewness risk denotes an economical problem and should not be included in the mathematical/statistical definition of skewness.
Rgomes1997 14:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Agreed.-- I think the inclusion of this article onto the main skewness page gives both subjects a better understanding. I agree that skewness risk does denote an economical problem but the fundamental content is one of general statistics. It should obviously have it's own section, but should be included (
Arvindeyunni (
talk) 20:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC))reply
merger might be not good
skewness article can just take care of skewness the concept itself while skewness risk is related to skewness, but not a part of it.
Jackzhp 02:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I agree with it not being merged. It is an important aspect of the theory, but it is stand alone in its economic importance. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
156.56.171.110 (
talk) 19:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)reply