Six-banded armadillo has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 8, 2016. ( Reviewed version).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Six-banded armadillo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 June 2016 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that in South America, taboos are associated with the consumption of the meat of the six-banded armadillo (pictured)? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Six-banded armadillo.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mammals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. South America: Argentina / Bolivia / Brazil / Paraguay / Suriname / Uruguay Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Bolivia (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Brazil (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Paraguay (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Suriname (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Uruguay (assessed as Low-importance).

Per WP:ENGVAR, this edit established the usage of this page as American English. Kindly maintain it, pending a new consensus to the contrary. —  LlywelynII 14:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Oh, forgot it. Will remember. Thanks, Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 00:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Six-banded armadillo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 ( talk · contribs) 15:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by Dunkleosteus77

• remove the refs from the lead

No idea who added them. Removed

• countries are not supposed to be wikilinked

Done

• expand IUCN on first use

Done

• ref no. 10 has an ISSN: 1537-1719

I prefer not to use ISSNs, there may be ISSNs for other refs as well so better be consistent in not using them.

• It might be better to use imperial units and have metric units in parentheses since this article is written in American English

I don't have experience with American English articles, so I looked up the FA Cougar. It seems to stick to metric units.

I'll ask the teahouse    User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk  21:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Euphractinae is wikilinked three times

Fixed

Thanks for taking this, I will get to the issues soon. Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 09:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Refs that have an ISSN:
  • ref no. 10: 1537-1719
  • ref no. 14: 1545-1542
  • ref no. 17: 1413-4411
  • ref no. 18: 0066-7870
  • ref no. 22: 1572-9710

OK added all now. Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 05:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Are the ears as long as the article says? That seems a bit unbelievable, perhaps there was a problem with the units...

68.47.30.107 ( talk) 14:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Yes, you're absolutely right. I found the source at this archived link and it says millimeters not centimeters. I have fixed the description accordingly. -- Pithon314 ( talk) 16:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC) reply